Enamel Crystal Shape: History of an Idea

¹ Department of Anatomy, McGill University, 3640 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B2

The purpose of this paper is to review evidence which casts doubt on the interpretation universally applied to hexagonal images seen in sectioned enamel. The evidence is based on two possible models to explain the hexagonal profiles seen in mammalian enamel with transmission electron microscopy. The "hexagonal ibbon"model proposes that hexagonal profiles are true cross-sections of elongated hexagonal ribbons. The " rectangular ribbon"model proposes that hexagonal profiles are caused by three-dimensional segments that are parallelepipeds contained in the Epon section. Since shadow projections of such rectangular segments give angles that are inconsistent with the hexagonal unit cell, a model based on ribbons with rhomboidal cut ends and angles of 60 and 120 ° is proposed. The "rhomboidal ribbon" model projects shadows with angles that are predicted by the unit cell. It is suggested that segments of such crystallites in section project as opaque hexagons on the imaging plane in routine transmission electron microscopy. Morphological observations on crystallites in sections — together with predictions from the hexagonal, rectangular, and rhomboidal ribbon models — indicate that crystallites in rat incisor enamel are flat ribbons with rhomboidal cross-sectional shape. Hexagonal images in electron micrographs of thin-sectioned enamel can result from rhomboidal-ended, parallelepiped-shaped segments of these crystallites projected and viewed as two-dimensional shadows.

Note:

The author is grateful to Drs.A. Nanci and P. Bai for their help with this work. The participation of Dr. Marc McKee and Ms. Jennifer Brown is also gratefully acknowledged.