ADR Sign up for ETOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wimpenny, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wimpenny, J.
Advances in Dental Research, Vol 11, Issue 1, 150-159
Copyright © 1997 by International & American Associations for Dental Research


Articles

The validity of models

JW Wimpenny

School of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

The ubiquity of biofilm and its classification as a microbial aggregate is discussed. Investigations into any microbial ecological problem operate at four levels: (i) in situ investigations, (ii) the use of microcosms, (iii) experimental model systems, and (iv) mathematical models. Each of these is defined and their use in biofilm research illustrated. It is concluded that all these approaches are valid and that scientific research in general and biofilm research in particular must profit by the use widely different methods if a complete understanding of a system is to be achieved.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. Shu, C. M. Browngardt, Y.-Y. M. Chen, and R. A. Burne
Role of Urease Enzymes in Stability of a 10-Species Oral Biofilm Consortium Cultivated in a Constant-Depth Film Fermenter
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2003; 71(12): 7188 - 7192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1997 Institutional Access Guidelines