Epigenetic signals during odontoblast differentiation

INSERM U424, Institut de Biologie Medicale, Faculte de Medecine, II, rue Humann, 67085 Strasbourg, France. Herve.Lesot@odonto-ulp.u-strasbg.fr

Odontoblast terminal differentiation occurs according to a tooth-specific pattern and implies both temporospatially regulated epigenetic signaling and the expression of specific competence. Differentiation of odontoblasts (withdrawal from the cell cycle, cytological polarization, and secretion of predentin/dentin) is controlled by the inner dental epithelium, and the basement membrane (BM) plays a major role both as a substrate and as a reservoir of paracrine molecules. Cytological differentiation implies changes in the organization of the cytoskeleton and is controlled by cytoskeleton-plasma membrane-extracellular matrix interactions. Fibronectin is re-distributed during odontoblast polarization and interacts with cell-surface molecules. A non-integrin 165-kDa fibronectin-binding protein, transiently expressed by odontoblasts, is involved in microfilament reorganization. Growth factors (TGF beta 1, 2, 3/BMP2, 4, and 6), expressed in tooth germs, signal differentiation. Systemically derived molecules (IGF1) may also intervene. IGF1 stimulates cytological but not functional differentiation of odontoblasts: The two events can thus be separated. Immobilized TGF beta 1 (combined with heparin) induced odontoblast differentiation. Only immobilized TGF beta 1 and 3 or a combination of FGF1 and TGF beta 1 stimulated the differentiation of functional odontoblasts over extended areas and allowed for maintenance of gradients of differentiation. Presentation of active molecules in vitro appeared to be of major importance; the BM should fulfill this role in vivo by immobilizing and spatially presenting TGF beta s. Attempts are being made to investigate the mechanisms which spatially control the initiation of odontoblast differentiation and those which regulate its propagation. Analysis of molar development suggested that odontoblast differentiation and crown morphogenesis are interdependent, although the possibility of co-regulation requires further investigation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R.-i. Manabe, K. Tsutsui, T. Yamada, M. Kimura, I. Nakano, C. Shimono, N. Sanzen, Y. Furutani, T. Fukuda, Y. Oguri, et al. Transcriptome-based systematic identification of extracellular matrix proteins PNAS, September 2, 2008; 105(35): 12849 - 12854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T Saini, A Ogunleye, N Levering, N S Norton, and P Edwards Multiple enamel pearls in two siblings detected by volumetric computed tomography Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 37(4): 240 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.S. Prime, M. Pring, M. Davies, and I.C. Paterson TGF-{beta} SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION IN ORO-FACIAL HEALTH AND NON-MALIGNANT DISEASE (PART I) Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., November 1, 2004; 15(6): 324 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Tremolizzo, A. Senna, and V. Rodriguez-Menendez Epigenetic Modulation for Reparative Dentinogenesis? J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2004; 83(3): 198 - 198. [Full Text]

				G. Townsend, L. Richards, and T. Hughes Molar Intercuspal Dimensions: Genetic Input to Phenotypic Variation J. Dent. Res., May 1, 2003; 82(5): 350 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]