ADR Sign up for ETOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartling, W.C.
Right arrow Articles by Visweswaran, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartling, W.C.
Right arrow Articles by Visweswaran, S.
Adv Dent Res 17:115-120, December, 2003
© 2003 International and American Associations for Dental Research

Retrieval and Classification of Dental Research Articles

W.C. Bartling1,*, T.K. Schleyer2, and S. Visweswaran1

1 Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA;
2 Center for Dental Informatics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA;

Correspondence: * corresponding author, wcb{at}cbmi.upmc.edu

Successful retrieval of a corpus of literature on a broad topic can be difficult. This study demonstrates a method to retrieve the dental and craniofacial research literature. We explored MeSH manually for dental or craniofacial indexing terms. MEDLINE was searched using these terms, and a random sample of references was extracted from the resulting set. Sixteen dental research experts categorized these articles, reading only the title and abstract, as either: (1) dental research, (2) dental non-research, (3) non-dental, or (4) not sure. Identify Patient Sets (IPS), a probabilistic text classifier, created models, based on the presence or absence of words or UMLS phrases, that distinguished dental research articles from all others. These models were applied to a test set with different inputs for each article: (1) title and abstract only, (2) MeSH terms only, or (3) both. By title and abstract only, IPS correctly classified 64% of all dental research articles present in the test set. The percentage of correctly classified dental research articles in this retrieved set was 71%. MeSH term inclusion decreased performance. Computer programs that use text input to categorize articles may aid in retrieval of a broad corpus of literature better than indexing terms or key words alone.

KEY WORDS: Dental research • information retrieval • inter-rater agreement • MEDLINE • MeSH • data mining • text classification




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Dent. Res.Home page
T.K. Schleyer
Dental Informatics: A Work in Progress
Adv. Dent. Res., December 1, 2003; 17(1): 9 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Dent. Res.Home page
T.K. Schleyer, P. Corby, and A.L. Gregg
A Preliminary Analysis of the Dental Informatics Literature
Adv. Dent. Res., December 1, 2003; 17(1): 20 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 2003 Institutional Access Guidelines