Local and systemic responses to dental composites and glass ionomers

College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

For many years, the dental profession worked mainly with rather inert restorative materials that had a limited contact with vital tissue, and the opportunity for local and systemic complications was minimal. However, conditions have changed in recent years where the two leading non-mercury-containing materials, resin composites and glass-ionomer cements, are chemically active compounds and can have detrimental effects on pulp tissue. With the advent of light-curing techniques with incremental layering, resin component formulae that were formerly found to be quite irritating to the pulp have become less so with the elimination of the need for matrices and pressure for good adaptation to be gained. As experience revealed the deficiencies and dangers of ultraviolet-light-curing techniques, visible-light-curing systems were developed that provided greater depth of cure, a higher degree of polymerization with less shrinkage with incremental layers, and less porosity. When glass-ionomer cements (GICs) were first introduced, with just one acid (polyacrylic), pulpal responses were classified as bland. With the addition of many more acids to enhance certain characteristics and reduce the setting time, GICs have become more irritating, especially when used as luting agents in areas where the remaining dentin thickness is 0.5 mm or less. Gold foil and amalgam are inert and innocuous restorative materials but require pressure for condensation which creates an exaggerated inflammatory response. This presentation emphasizes the pulpal responses and side-effects of these non-mercury-containing restorative materials and how to keep them within an acceptable range of biocompatibility. Despite the lack of any substantial appearance of soft tissue and systemic responses to resin composites and GICs, the results of a survey of recent literature are included.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.-J. Staehle, M.J. Koch, and T. Pioch Double-blind Study on Materials Testing with Applied Kinesiology J. Dent. Res., November 1, 2005; 84(11): 1066 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				ADA COUNCIL ON SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS Direct and indirect restorative materials J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2003; 134(4): 463 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]