ADR Sign up for ETOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vine, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vine, M. F.

Advances in Dental Research, Vol 8, 92-99, Copyright © 1994 by International & American Associations for Dental Research


ARTICLES

Biological markers: their use in quantitative assessments

M. F. Vine
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7400.

Biological markers can be conceptualized in terms of categories of markers that form a continuum representing a sequence of events from exposure to disease. These categories include markers of internal dose, biologically effective dose, early response, and disease. Outside of this sequence are susceptibility factors that can act at any point along the way to modify the effects of external exposures on disease outcomes. Examples of the use of these different types of markers in epidemiologic research are provided. There are many factors that one must consider when selecting a biological marker for use in an epidemiologic study. These factors include: the objectives of the study, the availability and specificity of potential markers, the feasibility of measuring the markers in various biological media, the invasiveness of the techniques necessary to measure the markers, the amount of biological specimen needed for analysis, the time to appearance of the markers in the biological media, the persistence of the markers in biological media, the variability of marker levels within and between individuals, the stability of markers in storage, as well as the cost, sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of the assays used to measure the markers. Each of these characteristics is discussed. The usefulness of biological markers in an epidemiologic study depends on the objectives of the study and whether the properties of the markers fulfill the objectives of the study in a feasible and cost-effective manner.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1994 Institutional Access Guidelines