ADR Sign up for ETOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjaerheim, V.
Right arrow Articles by Waaler, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kjaerheim, V.
Right arrow Articles by Waaler, S. M.

Advances in Dental Research, Vol 8, 302-306, Copyright © 1994 by International & American Associations for Dental Research


ARTICLES

Experiments with triclosan-containing mouthrinses: dose response--and an attempt to locate the receptor site(s) of triclosan in the mouth

V. Kjaerheim and S. M. Waaler
Department of Pedodontics and Caries Prophylaxis, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway.

A double-blind cross-over clinical study was performed on eight volunteers to determine the plaque-inhibiting effect of different triclosan- and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-containing mouthrinses. An attempt was also made to locate the binding site(s) of triclosan in the oral cavity. After the volunteers rinsed for four days with solutions of various concentrations of triclosan and/or SLS, plaque deposits were scored according to the Silness and Loe Plaque Index. The study showed that 0.15% and 0.3% concentrations of triclosan yielded a comparable plaque-inhibiting effect in vivo. Furthermore, the 0.1% triclosan with 1.5% SLS exhibited a higher (though not significant) effect than 0.1% triclosan with 0.75% SLS. The mouthrinse containing 0.05% triclosan and 0.25% SLS was as effective as the two mentioned mouthrinses containing 0.1% triclosan. Collectively, the results indicate that triclosan alone has an antiplaque effect, independent of the effect of SLS. Furthermore, the results suggest that the SLS monomers may play a role as carriers of triclosan and that the teeth are not the only binding site of triclosan, since topical application of 0.3% triclosan failed to produce a clinically discernible effect.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1994 Institutional Access Guidelines